Meta

Blogroll

The New York Times’ Alessandra Stanley is upset that NBC is focusing too much of its coverage of the 2010 Olympics on American athletes and seems to be (gasp) cheering for the Americans to do well and happy when they win events.

Technology evolves, organizers add new sports — this year it’s ski cross — but NBC’s Olympic reportage, up close and way too personal, never seems to change. And in Vancouver the best exploits of what the network unfailingly refers to as “Team USA” only bring out the worst in network heavy breathing.

At a time when American athletes are amassing record numbers of medals, and NBC is drawing an impressive number of viewers, sports fans couldn’t ask for more fulsome, pro-American coverage — they could ask for a little less. NBC anchors, including those paid by the news division, glom onto the glamour and reflected glory of winsome champions, as per Matt Lauer’s no-boundaries embrace of the skier Lindsey Vonn on “Today” after she won the downhill race. He draped a chocolate gold medal around her neck, gave her flowers (“just because we adore you”) and hugged her tight (“we are so proud of you”) — as if he and Meredith Vieira had spent the last 15 years rising at dawn to drive her to training.

The horror.  Athletes who Americans know getting profiled and congratulated on American television during a world event that is supposed to be about national pride.

Meanwhile, not to be outdone, the virulent leftist copycats at Gawker’s Deadspin rewrite Stanley’s article to hate American dominance just that much more.

The U.S. is on its way to perhaps its most successful Olympics ever, “owning the podium” that Canada hoped to keep for itself. A lot of those medals were captured in events that the U.S. was expected to win, so puffing out our chests and trashing talking about how awesome our boys and girls are kind of makes us look like the globe’s equivalent of Yankee fans. Yet, there is one popular sport where America is not the big kid on the block, but since our plucky upstarts are dominating anyway … well, break out the cigars, a-holes! The world community has to pay attention to the United States for once!

Yes, our NHL All-Star team beat another country’s NHL All-Star team in a tough hard-fought non-elimination game that is seriously being compared to the most important international sporting victory in our nation’s history. (Today is the 30th anniversary of America’s loss of perspective.) Canada, the politest country in the hemisphere, is seriously hurting right now and we are perfectly content to push their faces back down into the mud. Why can’t we feel good about ourselves? After a decade of war and financial ruin that we’re pretty much responsible for haven’t we earned it?

So sorry we win things, Deadspin. I guess we should lay down in some of these events to “spread the wealth around” and redistribute victory a little bit.  Apparently, minimizing American success is preferable to celebrating it.

As a side note, has anyone noticed that pretty much all articles at any Gawker site seem to be just random sentences written on a paper, cut up, thrown in the air and then put together randomly in a way that can only make sense to the person who wrote them?  And when did a year and a quarter of “financial ruin” become a decade?

Plus, is it even possible that we’re really in “financial ruin” when shitty writers like those at Deadspin are able to find paid work?




Like That? You'll Probably Like These.

Tagged

, , ,

2 Responses to “Inevitable: Left Complains NBC’s Olympic Coverage Too Patriotic”

Comments posted are the opinions of the individual poster and do not reflect the views of Bucks Right. Comments are only moderated to prevent spam. No legitimate opinions are altered for content, although we reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason. VALID e-mail address required.

  1. [...] Inevitable: Left Complains NBC’s Olympic Coverage Too Patriotic | Bucks Right. Categories: Political News Tags: 2010 olympics, Alessandra Stanley, America, american athletes, [...]

  2. Yaffer says:

    Did you hear the one about the mixed-up Progressive Blue Dog? Check out the “Dump Patrick Murphy” site and see how our boyish “Progressive Blue Dog” explains his new label. Murphy, we know, REALLY is a big spending, high taxing, earmark-loving progressive (read that lefty) who passes himself off as a Blue Dog when we all know he can be counted on to vote the Pelosi-way at least 90 percent of the time. In his own words, he describes himself as a “progressive” who “goes” to Blue Dog caucuses. Makes you want to cry. . .better yet, makes you want to vote him the heck out of there. Don’t miss it!

css.php